Martin Luther's 5F Theses

(Note for pretty much everyone: 5F is 95 in Hexadecimal.) Well, today, the revolution of the tech-masses has begun. Digg, a user-powered news site where people submit stories and vote stories up so that others may see them, made an unwise decision by silently removing a news story about the HD-DVD Key Crack (the decryption key that will allow players to extract the raw video data from any in-market HD-DVD's). (More about Digg in a second) Of course, the key itself is not particularly useful to the regular consumer, as one would need certain HD-DVD Decryption Software to actually get the video data from it. A few blogs posted the discovered key in February, and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) decided to send Cease and Desist letters to the blogs asking that they take down the keys, citing the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, a law protecting copyright owners from users trying to break copyright protection schemes.

So what is wrong about 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0? I mean, it's merely a series of hexadecimal digits, right? I mean, speaking 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 should have no intrinsic illegallity to it? I mean, I find 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 quite an amusing set of numbers, as you have E3, the now defunct gamer's expo, F9, the activation key for Apple's Exposé, D8, a clever shortening of 'date', and a few other amusing tidbits. It's not like 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 is going to destroy the world or anything? You might have heard about the Illegal Prime Numbers, prime numbers that when decompressed result in C code to decrypt DVD's copyright protection. Funny that, all these regular media companies are trying to censor and contain NUMBERS and STRINGS on the INTERNET. Good luck :-)

(Back to Digg) So when someone submitted 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 to Digg, many diggers voted the story up, and it recieved a rediculously high number of votes (about 15000, one of the site's highest in history), the MPAA sent a quick C&D to Digg, and Digg complied. However, as opposed to publicly stating that the MPAA had sent the C&D and informing the viewers of that story WHY the story was taken down, they silently deleted the story and banned the user who submitted it. Their Explanation sounds reasonable enough for the takedown, but many, MANY diggers thought they did it the wrong way. So they fought back, and the past 80 or so top-ranking stories have been about 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0.

Digg tried to remove some of the stories, but they could not keep up with the rampant pace. Images, T-shirts, posters, coffee mugs, songs, dos command boxes, mathematical manipulations, and every possible trick to get 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 out there. Wikipedia has perma-deleted the Appropriate Wikipedia Pages, Digg kept on deleting stories, but alas, the power of the Internet prevails.

The Pirate Bay posted the key on their front page, the entire face of Digg has been flooded with 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0, and finally, they relented. We shall see how Digg will recover, what the MPAA will do, and if the mainstream media will pick up on this.

Me personally? I have about 09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0 more things to do for school before finals, so I'm getting back to that. Enough procrastination for me :)

iConcertCal: A Music Lover's Dream!

I'm just quickly posting to tell you all about this cool iTunes Plugin: iConcertCal. After installing it (and restarting iTunes), you can go to the visualizer and check out all the concerts in your area from bands that are in your music library! I just used it to find a Killswitch Engage/Dragonforce concert on the 20th at the House of Blues. If it wasn't right in the middle of the week, I would probably end up going, but for those of you with wider tastes in music or time on your hands, this is an AWESOME application.

I reccomend checking it out as soon as possible.

Server Virtualization just got cheaper!

This is a very geeky post, but very interesting to me, and I thought I'd share my opinions... OK, so some of you have heard me prattle on to no end about 'virtualization', or basically running one computer inside another.

Some reading for the interested: http://www.vmware.com/virtualization/ http://news.zdnet.com/2036-2_22-6058678.html

Anyway... the only real issue with running multiple computers inside one big computer is software licensing costs. Right now, most software companies, like Microsoft, charge 'per installation', meaning that if you run 10 Windows Servers inside of one big VMWare server, you still have to pay for the software/licensing costs of 10 physical servers.

All that just changed. You can now buy Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition for one server, and run an UNLIMITED number of Windows virtual machines on one server, for FREE!

This means that if a new big business needed 10 servers to fully operate, they would normally spend ~$100,000, just for the bare boxes and windows alone. With this new revelation, a big business can have the redundancy, stability, and convenience of a virtualized environment and redundant storage for less!